The Idea of Villa Castagna
A garden is both a real place, and a cloud of possibilities. What you will find here will be both something real, and something that may or may not become real. For this reason you will find no map: Instead you will meet fragments, part real, part possible.
No Instagram images were found.
Pages
Links
Instagram
Sasanqua camellias are out on the terrace.Rowan berries at Montacute.Sunset over Vincent street. #montacutepavilionandgardens, #boutiqueaccommodation, #daylesford.getaways, #daylesford, #countrychic, #countryescape, #daylesfordmacedonranges, #daylesfordmacedonlife, #daylesfordweddings, #escapecompletely, #exclusiveretreat, #getaway, #GuestsLoveUs, #luxuryaccommodation, #luxurygetaways, #macedonranges, #mydaylesfordgetaway, #regionalvictoria, #countryvictoria, #romantic, #romanticgetaway, #roomwithaview, #spacountry, #spacountryvictoria, #travel, #viewretreats, #visithepburnshire, #visitvictoria, #wandervictoriaAutumn sunset down Central Springs road. #montacutepavilionandgardens, #boutiqueaccommodation, #daylesford.getaways, #daylesford, #countrychic, #countryescape, #daylesfordmacedonranges, #daylesfordmacedonlife, #daylesfordweddings, #escapecompletely, #exclusiveretreat, #getaway, #GuestsLoveUs, #luxuryaccommodation, #luxurygetaways, #macedonranges, #mydaylesfordgetaway, #regionalvictoria, #countryvictoria, #romantic, #romanticgetaway, #roomwithaview, #spacountry, #spacountryvictoria, #travel, #viewretreats, #visithepburnshire, #visitvictoria, #wandervictoria
Archives
- April 2021
- July 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- December 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- November 2013
- June 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- April 2010
Categories
- All Posts
- Architectural paintings
- Architecture
- Art
- Arts and Crafts Movement
- Baroque architecture
- Baroque Gardens
- Book Commentaries
- Catalogue of painting by G. P. Panini
- Comment
- Construction
- Country Houses
- Daylesford
- Design
- Elizabethan Architecture
- English Gardens
- Fabriques
- Garden History
- Menu
- Montacute
- Movie Commentaries
- Paintings by G. P. Panini
- Plants
- Restoration and Conservation
- Reviews
- Rome
- Town and Village
- Uncategorized
- Villa Castagna
- Villas
- Wombat Hill Botanical Gardens
Tags
- Art Deco architecture
- Arts and Crafts
- Arundel Castle
- Australian Gardens
- Bagatelle
- Baroque Gardens
- Bolzano
- Burghley House
- Chaumont
- Chestnut trees
- Chinoiserie
- cladding
- Clough Williams-Ellis
- Colosseum
- creative gardens
- Daylesford
- Dunmore Pineapple
- Elizabethan architecture
- English Gardens
- Evelyn Waugh
- Fabriques
- follies
- Fontainebleau
- Fountains
- future ruin
- Garden History
- Garden Sculpture
- Gaspar van Wittel
- Giulio Romano
- Grand Designs
- Grosssedlitz
- hanseatic timber building
- Harold Peto
- Highgrove
- Hobbit
- Ian Hamilton Finlay
- Iford Manor
- jemima grey
- Journal of the History of Gardens
- Kelmscott Manor
- Lord of the Rings
- Lorenzo Maitani
- Luigi Rossini
- Mantua
- Marcel Duchamp
- milk crate
- monkey puzzle trees
- Montacute
- natural timber finishes
- Orvieto
- Palazzo del Te
- Piranesi
- Portmeirion
- Poundbury
- Roman topography
- Rome
- Schloss Luisium; Wörlitz; architecture; Neoclassicism;
- silvertop ash
- Structures
- suburban design
- Tim Richardson
- Trautsmandorff
- Trento
- triglyph
- Tynesfield
- Vanvitelli
- van Wittel
- Vignanello
- Villa D'Este
- Villa Doria-Pamphilj
- W.G. Sebald
- Willem van Nieulandt II
- Wombat Hill Botanical Gardens
- wooden churches
- wrest park
- The Villa Castagna Daylesford website operates under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivs 3.0 licence. For a summary account of the terms of this license see Creative Commons
On Recent Proposals for Rebuilding the Roof and Spire of Notre Dame
Within a month of the destruction by fire of the roof and flèche (crossing spire) of Notre Dame in Paris, proposals by architects for their replacement abound. Why are these designs so awful? The answer is simple: they lack respect. Architects, and Kevin McCloud, continue to trot out the tired idea that first had currency in about 1870: that architecture must express the nineteenth/twentieth/twenty-first century. So, the argument runs, Viollet-le-Duc’s flèche expresses the nineteenth century, so we need to get a cool modern architect to design one that expresses the twenty-first century. And why stop there? Why not do something cool where the roof used to be? In practice, this means the architect digs into their repertory and finds a way of applying this to the site.
This misses the crucial point: Viollet-le-Duc was trying to create a medieval flèche, not a nineteenth-century one. His argument ran rather differently. What did the medieval church have? Failing that, what might it have had? Failing that, what is the best design I can come up with in the medieval style. Is it beautiful in the way that comparable medieval structure are beautiful? And would this design evoke (rather than express) what I value in the Middle Ages? And Viollet-le-Duc, because he had devoted his life to such questions, came up with something that did all this. To be sure, because he was working in the nineteenth century, his structure is a nineteenth-century one. His Middle Ages was not, and could not be, the Middle Ages’ Middle Ages, but he did not set out to express the nineteenth century. He wanted to create a medieval structure, because the Middle Ages, and medieval buildings, were good. By being humble in relation to the Middle Ages, he succeeded in inscribing himself into Notre Dame. His work became part of it.
Compare this to the crassness of contemporary architects. The tenor was set by Pinault, the Bettencourt Meyers family, and Patrick Pouyanne, who immediately attempted to inscribe themselves into the building, and so give themselves eternal life, by offering huge sums to rebuild it. They were followed by Macron, promising to rebuild within five years in order to inscribe himself into the rebuilding process: ‘it was rebuilt on my watch’. Architects quickly followed. Being all ego, they attempted to inscribe themselves into the monument and so appropriate to themselves its timeless importance, its holiness even. (The moment is perhaps ripe to redo Erwin Panofsky’s Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism as Notre Dame and Hyper-Capitalism.) It is the same way that artists operate, seeking to colonise historical art museums in order to boost their egos: people go to an art museum to see Rembrandt, because Rembrandt is a great artist: if I replace Rembrandt with myself people will go to the art museum and see me; therefore I am a great artist, as timelessly significant as Rembrandt.
It would be a different matter if architects were presenting designs that attempted to be to ‘truly’ medieval. That might be interesting.
© David R. Marshall 2019
Share this:
Like this:
Related